Post by terminate on Apr 27, 2014 1:52:29 GMT -6
mining on middlecoin is the 2nd worst choice IMMEDIATELY AFTER directly mining LTC according to reliable verifiable statistical data compiled for the last 30 days
poolpicker.eu/text.php
...so it says here... and I have no reason not to believe the data
I don't know what exactly is your reasoning, but I believe that ignoring the evidence does not sit well with none of the investors in this project
the market share price is now barely double the IPO price partly because the profits are not what's expected from a mining pool of this magnitude and 34,79% (as of the moment of this post - 17,382,696 from 49,959,999) of the shares in circulation are waiting in the dumping cue to be picked by more gullible buyers willing to wait for your wise unilateral more or less (un)informed decisions
pompous declarations and techno-babble riddled announcements gets you only so far...
speculators aside, I am convinced that I'm not the only one that had enough patience with this getting his own legs
this should be a warning signal not to be ignored, for the manager(s) and investors alike
cloud mining projects are sprouting everyday
the entry barrier is lower and lower
now is as low as 0,0056 BTC/GHS on SHA-256 and 0,0010 BTC/KHS on scrypt
those who are interested in specifics, may PM me for links
I don't know if posting them here is in compliance with the forum's policy and I expect it not to be, considering the general climate I've managed to observe on this project's forum
mining is a math based endeavor, not a rainbow chasing one
do the math
make decisions
Not sure what "techno-babble" and "pompous declarations" you speak of...
The purpose of this pool is to return long term results to the investors. And that is what it will do and IS DOING...
If you want to discuss math, why don’t you lay out your math here in the forum... show me your calculations....
Otherwise, you have no argument..
as manager of this project, you manage the investors resources, not the other way around
that's why you should be more receptive to inputs
I've sent you my concerns regarding the middlecoin more than 3 weeks ago and I've even suggested a mining strategy I've personally verified, that gets better results than yours
you chose to ignore it for reasons that still escapes me
when the truth stares you in the face and you choose not to acknowledge it, you loose credibility and more importantly, TRUST
the burden of proof (math wise) rests on your shoulders, because you're the one that was presented with evidence proving that your choice is at least uninspired, if not uninformed or malevolent, and that's bad for a manager
don't bother to reply
I have no interest in debating with you anymore
you're mining for money, too, not only for fun, so results matter
I was interested in results
you failed to deliver
I'm out, already
good luck!
you'll need it!